And the reasons for that anger, modern science tells us, are hardly abstract: women feel most enraged by condescension, neglect, and rejection. One researcher found that overwhelmingly "women tend to be angered by the negative behaviors of men, whereas men tend to be angered by women's negative emotional reactions. Yet Proverbs neither warns men to alter their behavior, nor does it suggest that they might be the source of a woman's anger.
It simply suggests that they seek masculine solitude. Perhaps that's why societies, seemingly regardless of time frame or location, treat women's anger with such disdain. Arguably the first woman to truly embrace anger was the appropriately named 16th-century writer Jane Anger. In pamphlet , Protection for Women , Jane rails against the ignorance of her male counterparts, their easy recourse to stereotypes of the gentler sex, their haughty belief that impression is synonymous with fact.
Jane did not write her fervid pamphlet to ferret out and respond to the claims of men: she wrote Protection for Women to express the inexpressible.
The Online Reference Guide to African American History
She wrote it to express her anger. Societies, seemingly regardless of time frame or location, treat women's anger with disdain. Jane herself acknowledges that rage was her muse and describes her text as one "that which my [bad-tempered vanity] hath rashly set downe Jane took neither shit nor prisoners in her proto-feminist manifesto, hitting men hard for lechery, excess, and their refusal to break with rhetorical traditions that painted women as witless sluts:.
Was there ever any so abused, so slandered, so railed upon, or so wickedly handled undeservedly, as are we women? Whether or not Jane Anger was a nom de plume or a conveniently perfect name is something that scholars of early English literature still debate. Some men wonder whether or not Jane was a woman at all, or if she was a man claiming a woman's voice; a "ventriloquizing woman" it's called. But it seems unlikely that Jane was a man—no man could muster up such passion and let a woman take credit. Jane would prove to be an influential figure.
Her pamphlet one of the earliest articulations of frustrations felt over the dominant perception of women, particularly since such perceptions increasingly determined women's roles in heterosexual relationships. It was precisely that ideology that Mary Wollstonecraft was attacking in A Vindication of the Rights of Women when she wrote, "I war only with the sensibility that led him to degrade woman by making her the slave of love.
Wollstonecraft's anger was softened by gentility—she had none of Jane Anger's anonymity—yet she nonetheless explored the depths of angry expression. It was anger born of the absence of visibility and, by extension, the absence of identity. That kind of deeply intellectualized anger was a more typical method of articulation.
Virginia Woolf might have been the ultimate embodiment of that kind of refined rage. So much of her work is an exploration of the frustrations created by wielding language without any power. In A Room of One's Own , Woolf charts the anger in other women's writing and refracts her own anger through that history. She sees that anger as a reaction to women's plight as second-class citizens, particularly in the work of Charlotte Bronte—a writer so angry that she wrote a madwoman into an attic and burned down the house. Anger haunts the work of Woolf, of Bronte, of many lady novelists that felt the fearful force of oppression.
Woolf's anger found new form in the mid-twentieth-century, a period that was truly the golden age of angry women. Second-wave feminism was underpinned by the expression of rage; a generation of women birthed the angry feminist, and they did so believing that it would dismantle the patriarchy. I have nurtured and protected my feminist anger like a cherished daughter. For six minutes, Rosler recites the alphabet, holding up a kitchen implement that corresponds to that letter: "A, apron," Rosler says while staring into the camera.
- Browse By Tag.
- Poetry Friday: Women's Rage - Bohomofo!
- Site Index!
- Anger Poems about Love!
As she recites, labeling the objects of her oppression, she grows increasingly unhinged. She stabs with knives, slams down heavy equipment, and by the letters "W, X, Y, Z," she's quit the attempt to name kitchen objects at all. Instead she contorts her body to resemble the letters, wielding a knife in her right hand and a fork in the other.
- Ships as they are revealed in Scripture.
- 'Rage' poems - Hello Poetry.
- (1981) Audre Lorde, “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism”.
- A Mad Woman on Fire: On Sylvia Plath and Female Rage - The Millions.
- Ernest Hemingway: A Biography.
- Anger Poems - Poems For Anger - - Poem by | Poem Hunter.
At "Z," she puts down the fork and, like Zorro, slashes a Z through the air. In the hands of Rosler, the celebratory action of a fictional hero turns into a menacing expression of powerlessness. Solanas, more to the point, just called men a "shitpile. Rosler had her knives; Solanas, who later shot Andy Warhol, had her gun. That kind of violent anger was new, not the kind mustered up by men in poetry, and not the kind that can be fractured by beauty or infantilized. But on a deeper level, I felt dismissed, diminished. Everything looks different now.
She lives in New York City. Thanks for stopping by. If you like what you see, subscribe to our RSS feed. So, whose book is the biggest? The controversy will soon be put to rest, possibly for all time, when writer Richard Grossman installs his 3 million-page novel Breeze Avenue on a remote mountain in Kaha, Hawaii. Although it is unclear how many words Breeze Avenue comprises, an educated guess puts the count at over 1 billion.
Grossman, and a cast of hundreds, have been working on the book for over thirty-five years, and it remains in a constant state of revision. Grossman tentatively plans to print just six copies of the book, each of which will comprise 4, volumes of pages. There are also plans to make the entire work available online through a virtual reading room. Thousands of pages of poetry are translated into other languages — among them, Hebrew, Chinese, American Sign Language and various programming languages — and then back translated to create interchangeable sub-elements of which Grossman claims there are 1,, Pictures of buyers, who must apply to purchase the book, will be incorporated into the text itself.
Like a labyrinth in which you can be lost to be found. The instrument, which Grossman refers to as the Car-iolon, is composed of thirteen cars one of which he calls the harpsicar , which drive in tandem while playing music. The instrument plays a role in the book, and its first performance was held last Fall, with music specially composed for the event by Philip Glass. Part 1 focused on Form and Style. Part 3 will focus on Audience, Character, and Conclusion.
It could be real, but everything is slightly exaggerated or off in the way of good science-fiction.
The rational philosophers of the College of Lucidity refer to themselves by number rather than name, for example, which works both as a cool detail and as a commentary on the humanistic blind-spots of the Enlightenment, which we discussed earlier. Emily: And one historical footnote in particular gets a lot of attention. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce.
And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he also obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed against the LIBERTIES of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the LIVES of an other.
Garth: This is totally fascinating, Emily. And it is a revelation, to me at least: I had no idea this was ever in the Declaration of Independence. I want to flag, too, for future discussion, the sensibility Jefferson reveals in that deleted clause. Is he a rank hypocrite? They explain that the freedom the revolution seeks to ensure is the freedom of exchange capitalism , rather than some more abstract, philosophical freedom that would require the freeing of slaves.
The scene is on par with Orwell or Kafka — the rational irrationality, the rational cruelty, the commitment to cold, abstract principals when the hideous inhumanity those principals inflict screams out for recognition. Garth: As a scholar of the 18th Century, you know a lot more about this than I do. Until heaven is at hand, we struggle and contradict ourselves and do our best to explain away our blind spots.
Rage Quotes ( quotes)
This is going to tie in to some things I want to say about character in the third part of our discussion, but I wanted to give you a chance to jump in and comment here. Emily: Freedom of exchange was definitely a part of the impetus for the revolution. But this is not to deny a genuine intellectual and emotional commitment to the abstract ideal of freedom among the revolutionaries, or the reality that some believed the revolution would bring an end to slavery, and that there was a Christian imperative to end slavery.