I know without using the chart, too. And I know what it means. He had now an almost savage expression. With anger he said, 'Germany and Japan lost the war? Here Rosenfeld refers to what he interprets as the inability of the majority of characters in the main narrative — and, by symbolic extension, the majority of people in general — to recognize the fictitious nature of their world and break through the illusion.
In fact, this secondary allohistorical scenario is, in many ways, just as bleak as that of the MHC, In Grasshopper, Germany not winning the Second World War does not result in the abolition of totalitarian control or politicized racial discrimination and does not produce a more liberal, progressive society. Instead, elements of German fascism are projected onto Britain after the end of the war, resulting in a global proliferation of racist policies and the subjugation of large parts of the world under imperialist rule.
More significant, however, is the relation of this secondary counterfactual story to actual history. Here, the suggestion that the world could have turned out just as badly even if the defeat of Nazi Germany played out more or less as it did, inevitably constitutes a universalizing perspective, an aspect of the novel that, albeit without an explicit acknowledgement of the role of Grasshopper in this regard, has also been noted by Carl Freedman: In a way that strongly resonates with what Horkheimer and Adorno call the dialectic of enlightenment, the novel sees Nazi atrocity as the extreme but perfectly logical extension of something typically and profoundly Western: the valorization of ceaseless activity, of agency, of expansion and acquisition and domination […] Capitalism, after all, is necessarily driven by an expansionist and dominative dynamic, and even in its most liberal versions is inescapably dependent upon violence […].
This type of projection clearly goes beyond a mere critique of the ubiquity and innate cruelty of Capitalism, but effectively suspends the historical specificity of the political developments in Germany that ultimately led to the singular event of the Holocaust. This difference becomes more apparent as we turn to the first example of German Alternate Histories. It is revealed in the only published review of the novel that Sissini is, in fact, the pen name of Greek economist Dimitris N. Chorafas, who has made a name for himself not as an author of fiction but as an economics professor and financial advisor, mainly in the United States and Canada since the s.
Hereafter cited as SH. It is interesting to note in this context that the use of pseudonyms, attributing especially right-wing German Alternate Histories to obscure American authors with fictional biographies, is not unheard of. See especially the so-called Stahlfront series and its aptly named author Torn Chaines.
Neumann mentions that the advance manuscript still listed Chorafas as the author, indicating that the decision to use a pseudonym was made last minute in the publication process.
- The Coexistence of Art & Money.
- FEYERABEND , Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, September, .
- Christian Hißnauer | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - qyjywolu.tk!
- Shades of Deception (Crestar System Book 4)!
- Notas zur spanischen Literatur im kritischen Werk Rubén Daríos (German Edition)?
Broder and has become exemplary evidence of the existence of Jewish anti- Semitism. What makes his rendition of this theme unusual, however, and, in fact, the only one of its kind, is the cause which effects this greater success. However, this is not portrayed as a moral critique but rather a strategic one. While, from a primarily prescriptive perspective, this choice of alteration would first and foremost make Samuel Hitler highly problematic with regard to its historical plausibility, it also makes it an early, prototypical example of the narrative strategies that constitute alternate memory.
While the historical setting is very familiar, place and character names have been altered, effectively alienating the narrative from real history. The names of the known historical protagonists have been changed ever so slightly, while still maintaining their recognizability. Hitler is one of the few prominent characters who retains his last name, but for him, the changes are, of course, much more radical.
Hellekson, Alternate History, 8. Both Lazarus and Samuel acknowledge the brutality with which the process of Chinese unification was achieved, but relegate it to the status of a necessary evil in the process of building a great nation SH In the early chapters of the book, anti-Semitism directed at the Jewish Hitler by his immediate peers only surfaces in one short paragraph, which describes the young Samuel as an outsider in school as a result of his heritage. The real alteration here is, of course, not the claim that a virulent anti-Semitic ideology also existed and still exists in countries like England and the United States, in a more or less identical narrative as in the German anti-Jewish tradition; the central change lies in the suggestion that British and American anti-Semitism was, at the same time, directed at Germany for having forged a historical alliance with the Jews.
This depiction sets the scene for the overarching universalizing narrative of the novel: It already makes clear at an early stage that, judging from the globalized hatred of Jews, the Holocaust was basically possible anywhere and, in turn, it implicitly insinuates that the institutionalization of anti- Semitism was neither a necessary nor a particularly alluring factor in the context of the rise and the success of National Socialism in Germany. This is most apparent when Samuel contrasts himself with Rosa Luxemburg one of the few historical characters who keep their real names , whom he understands as a misguided idealist, but whose necessary inability to succeed on the German political stage ultimately comes down to race.
The central-most representation of this is the design of the alternate Nazi flag, which is no longer adorned by a swastika, but instead features Samuel Hitler's initials SH This symbol is depicted on the cover of the only edition of the novel in such a way that the S is superimposed on the H, creating dollar sign — the traditional link between Judaism and money. For the whole of the alternate narrative, the last aspect is of heightened importance because, to a considerable extent, the role of the Jews as scapegoats, the necessity of which for the mobilization of the masses Samuel learned from his father, is delegated to Communists.
See also Oddly, however, the 'Reichstagsbrand' does not occur in the story. By Between this date and the invasion of Poland on 1 September, , national politics in Germany follow the course of real history surprisingly closely. This is, of course, no coincidence, but a programmatic trait.
Or, in other words: If Hitler had himself been a Jew and had experienced an entirely different upbringing, history would have progressed in an almost identical fashion, but the Holocaust would never have occurred in Germany. The incrimination of the United States Neuland is realized, on the one hand, through misrepresentations of actual historical developments. In this context, the text moves the institutionalized displacement and murder of the American Indians forward through time into the middle of the 20th century and, likewise, moves the Watergate Landgate scandal back to also coincide with the Nazi regime.
A similar strategy is applied to both Poland and the Soviet Union, only here with the added dimension that the projections are directly invoked to legitimize German acts of war against both nations.
A recreation of the real Holocaust, but without German SH And, later in the war, Operation Barbarossa is justified in a similar fashion: While the entire text is characterized by a relativist tone, these passages epitomize its overall universalizing strategy. By projecting the real historical anti-Semitism of the Third Reich onto other nations and contrasting it with the fictitious rationality and relative humanity of Altland, the text creates an alternate memory narrative which enables the inclined reader to harness certain aspects of this counterfactual scenario for a revision of the collective memory of National Socialism.
It propagates nothing less than the necessity of a total re-evaluation of the character and legacy of National Socialism by suggesting that the factual historical developments between the end of the First World War and the beginning of the Second were not primarily contingent on the ideological disposition of a majority of Germans — i. Consequently, the Third Reich is not only able to retain leading scientific minds such as Albert Einstein Dreistein , but even recruit Jewish scientists from other countries, such as J. With the most influential scientific minds of the s now concentrated and collaborating in Altland, the most groundbreaking innovations do not only occur there before anywhere else, they also — for a large This alteration also extends to other academic fields and includes a number of prominent psychologists and other representatives of the Social Sciences.
Perhaps the most poignant — and, from a historical perspective, most grotesque — example is the fact that the entire Frankfurter Schule remains a part of German academia under the alternate National Socialist regime SH Meanwhile, the cumulative efforts in Altland speed up the development and manage to successfully test the first atomic bomb on 16 January, While there is no definitive date given for the beginning of the serial production of the A4 rocket, the passage in which this is mentioned is located well before the outbreak of the war in the text.
In real history, the rocket was not ready for regular use until It is significant to note that this final victory of Altland, despite being a major alteration in its own right, does not come without its share of revisionist undertones. This is represented, on the one hand, by the relativist portrayal of the aftermath of the bombing of Norfolk, in which the victims of the attack itself are altogether absent and the narrator exclusively focuses on retaliatory violence perpetrated by Americans against German See SH In contrast, the first successful test in the context of the Manhattan Project was conducted on 16 July, An explicit date for these two events is curiously absent here, but it seems a safe assumption that the progression follows the same timeline as the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the surrender of Japan, putting them within three and nine days of the first bombing, respectively.
For the reader, this SF turn of events does not actually not come as a surprise. Hitler IV is, in fact, the first incarnation we encounter in the text, coordinating the bombing of Baltimore in the proleptical first chapter. More importantly, however, in the narrative as a whole, this is not a sudden, but a gradual development. The final chapter displays distinct aspects of anti- modern angst, pessimistically foreshadowing a dystopian future in which technology will claim See SH The development of advanced computer systems is, without question, the most important technological allohistorical motif and by far the most significant scientific acceleration in the text.
As early as the mids, the Third Reich implements a de facto automatization of the lower ranks of government with a database processing information in ways and dimensions far ahead of its time. Februar , um 7. Therefore the question arises: Which sectors of See SH It is not mentioned whether he is recruited from the United States or never leaves Europe in the first place. Here, it is not the victory of Nazi Germany that is the center of SH The story is told on two narrative levels, covering two alternative timelines.
The primary narrative centers on two main protagonists: The British history student Michael Young and the German physicist Leo Zuckermann. The specific historical knowledge this particular field of research has afforded him is put to advantageous use — after his dissertation is vocally rejected as prosaic tripe by his supervisor — when he accidentally meets Leo Zuckermann, an elderly German physicist and Cambridge fellow. As a result of this realization, he is plagued by such immense guilt that he becomes obsessed with the past and eventually develops a device to see backwards through time — the Temporal Imaging Machine, or TIM.
While TIM is no time machine in the strictest sense, Michael and Leo eventually discover that they are able to use the device as a transmitter for very small objects. Regardless of his personal situation, the fact that Hitler never lived, he naturally assumes, must mean that the world has been altered for the better. It is only gradually that he realizes his error.
Again, the reader is presented with a second narrative, which is now presented from the perspective of Rudolf Gloder. Virtually worshipped by his men for his honorable personality and camaraderie that appears to know no rank, in this alternate timeline, Gloder evades death as a result of the risky maneuver Hitler had dared him into in the previous timeline by sending a willing subordinate in his stead. After this event, it is finally revealed that Gloder is merely acting the part of the likeable comrade to foster his own advancement and that he is indeed a cunning careerist who literally leaves dead bodies in his trail on the way to the top.
As the story progresses, Gloder follows a similar path as Hitler in real history, only with much greater success at every step, as a result of his particular intellectual and social talents. Meanwhile, in Princeton, Michael quickly learns that the alternate history he created is not actually improved at all. Michael soon realizes that history has, in fact, turned out much worse through the removal of Hitler.
In the following years, Gloder not only manages to achieve a greater degree of unification among the disparate political factions Making History, Internationally, he fosters the image of a cosmopolitan benevolent statesman, resulting in mutual trade agreements with Great Britain, and in even receives the Nobel Peace Prize. Finally, in , the world realizes that Gloder has harbored a secret agenda all along. In the wake of the attack, the Wehrmacht occupies nearly all of Eastern Europe, as well as Turkey and Greece. A short time later, the Western European nations surrender without a fight and Germany strikes a cooperative agreement with the United States.
In response, the United States sever diplomatic relations and a rebellion breaks out in Britain, which is brutally quashed by German forces. Rumors emerge from the Jewish Free State about systematic killings of its inhabitants, causing the United States to threaten war on the German Reich, which does not break out, however, due to American fears about the development of superior German weapons systems.
Homosexuality is still a crime in the Making History, Not in Europe. While initially it appears that, in the second timeline, at least Auschwitz did not exist, the reader later learns that, instead of a concentration camp, the town of Auschwitz was home to a German research facility in which Dietrich Bauer and Johann Kremer conducted experiments on a very special substance.
Kremer had previously become aware of a strange case of localized infertility in the late 19th century in the Austrian town of Braunau am Inn. The Jews were a threat. A real threat. Something had to be done, everyone thought so. After all, the one constant in the two timelines is the widespread resentment of the German population, which the text explicitly emphasizes at various occasions. Militarily we are doing well, we have a clear advantage, everyone knows that. It is only on the home front that we are losing.
Morale is being fucked by the Bolsheviks, the pacifists and the artist queers.
I suppose I should have known better. The circumstances were still the same in Europe. There was still a vacuum in Germany waiting to be filled. There was still fifty years of anti- Semitism and nationalism ready to be exploited. Rather, there are several clear indicators that not only acknowledge, but in fact highlight the responsibility of the German people for the legacy of National Socialism and the Holocaust.
Like Dick, Fry does not direct his narrative at a German audience and he does not partake in the popular normalizing trends of postwar Germany. Rather, his narrative is targeting the forgetfulness of his compatriots, of those who would allow revisions of history to go unchallenged. This group is represented in the text itself by the reaction of the two CIA agents interviewing Michael, as representatives of the last remaining opponent of the alternate Nazi Germany, when one of them dismisses the previously secret information about Making History, Carl, the protagonist, a student of political science at the University of Munich, decides to visit Luise, his cousin, in Dresden.
Already the spontaneity of his travel plans and the casual agreement between him and Luise must have appeared strange to a contemporary reader, with an increased awareness of the bureaucracy involved in travelling from West to East Germany in Throughout the story, Carl continuously reflects on the past and present of this alternate Germany beginning with subtle remarks and passing observations, ultimately building to a radical externalization of aspects of real German history onto other countries. This potential for misinterpretation, however, is gradually removed as the story progresses.
Another notable change laid out in this passage is the exchange between the French man and the Hungarian teenagers, when they speak about their travels across Europe and state that they are currently also headed for Nuremberg to stay with friends. The teenagers respond that it was precisely this historic character that attracted them in the first place.
While changing trains in Hof, he encounters a large group of students on a school trip waiting on the platform and, subsequently, three buses from which senior travellers emerge in droves. The realization that the city of Wroclaw was evidently not ceded to Poland in the aftermath of World War II represents a threshold in the narrative: From here on in, there can no longer really be any question about significant changes to history as the reader knows it.
Consequentially, its casual integration into the story — establishing not merely the fact that the city presently still belongs to Germany, but implying more generally a state of German normalcy — indirectly, but efficiently, addresses this status and thereby caters to a position that is, at best, equally as concerned with the suffering of Germans as a result of the loss of the war as with the suffering of their victims in the twelve years prior. The students speak with a heavy Saxonian accent and the buses, Carl notes, are all from Chemnitz.
Aside from the revealing reference to the city that was actually Karl-Marx-Stadt in the GDR, the utter normalcy that is conveyed in the description of this encounter once more constitutes a key aspect of its description. Like the forfeiture of German territories in the previous passage, this episode addresses an essential element of postwar discourses of German loss: the division of Germany.
While the existence of two separate German states constituted a general paradigm of the way in which the Second World War negatively affected the German population, the freedom of movement of the citizens of the GDR or, rather, the absence thereof, has always featured as an especially significant tenet — both in pre West Germany and in post-unification debates — of the integral demonization of East Germany in official and popular See ibid.
At the same time, his own critical, sarcastic perspective on these impressions establishes himself as a representative of more a more modern, a more progressive Germany, effectively guarding against potential allegations of over-idealizing German traditions. Carl and the Professor from Bonn near Cologne discuss the history of Spanish literature following the Francoist coup in , during which the German government remained neutral.
In response to the fascist takeover, many members of the literary community of Spain fled the country and sought refuge, as it turns out, in the much more liberal Germany. In the alternate Germany, the trip from Munich to Leipzig is unhindered by any effects of the real historical division of Germany. While seated in the dining car, Carl is joined by a middle- aged Italian woman who instantly notices the textbook on fascism in Italy that he is reading. While the overall historical development — that is, the time and circumstances of the rise and fall of Italian fascism — remain largely unchanged, some key characteristics are tellingly altered.
But most centrally it is the emotional subjectivity of her recollections that drive the narrative. Der Rest: biologischer Unrat. Over her family history, which she remembers as being defined by living in fear of the authorities, the account goes on to comment on the racist policies of the regime: This passage is at once a crucial historical alteration and an effective means of projection with See ibid.
While the Italian fascist system did include racist and anti-Semitic elements, they did not develop a significant status in the policies and propaganda of the regime until the formation of the Axis in the wake of the German intervention into the war in Abyssinia in support of the Italian forces. Man kann es ja wirklich kaum verstehen[.
german-decompounder/qyjywolu.tk at master · uschindler/german-decompounder · GitHub
Without the legacy of an essentially extrinsic ideology weighing on their collective conscience, the alternate Germans enjoy freedoms that the Italians are denied, the foremost of which is a positive national identity. This difference is explicitly acknowledged by the Italian woman, who expresses her envy for Carl, as representative of the German people, by marveling: The relative subtlety of the previous passages is finally abandoned here.
Italics in the original. The counterfactual mode specifically enables this kind of casual, selective historical elision and permits it to function, at the same time, as a source for the formation of new memories that ultimately facilitate an overcoming of the real legacy of the fictionally omitted events. Rather, here Hitler never enters the sphere of politics at all, but instead realizes his adolescent dream of becoming a professional painter.
After the real historical two failed attempts, the alternate Hitler decides to apply for admission into the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna for a third time and is finally accepted. In counterfactual retrospect, these years of patriotic heroism are described as having a profound influence on the development of his later style. However, there is a considerable problem with this reading. By itself, this level of the narrative may indeed be taken to imply that German society experienced considerable improvements as a result of the fact that Adolf Hitler never ascended to political power.
Rosenfeld acknowledges the existence of this critical voice, but not the fundamental impact it has on the speech itself. Only an examination of both layers of the narrative in combination reveals the meticulous generalizations at work in the text and calls into question the seamless comparisons with earlier German Alternate Histories of the Third Reich.
Wo ich es endlich zum leitenden Angestellten in der Kulturabteilung gebracht habe? Vielleicht sollte ich auswandern. The alternatives for this choice, however, are significant here. Und was haben wir stattdessen? Hitler, nichts als Hitler! This idea of endless expansion and prospective global domination again engenders distinct associations with the Third Reich.
In parallel with the speech itself, the critical commentary thus serves to accentuate the thinly veiled negative aspects of the alternate Germany within the laudatory whole and echoes the real memory of National Socialism sometimes subtly, sometimes less so. One can only speculate as to why the United States are absent from this list, seeing as they are commonly the representation of choice in popular criticisms of globalization.
However, the fact that Wedemeyer-Schwiersch suggests such a broad selection of analogues only emphasizes the universalistic direction of her allohistorical approach. At the same time, this is precisely what enables the narrative to function as an alternate memory.
- Pleasure and Power in Nazi Germany.
- UBC Theses and Dissertations.
- About this book.
- Blandings: TV Tie-In?
Wedemeyer-Schwiersch creates a quasi-fascist Germany which does not merely resemble the actual Nazi Germany, but which is at the same time recognizably and intentionally linked to the political economy of contemporary globalized Capitalism, in which international corporations wield immense political power.
The exemplary texts in this chapter illustrate in detail the ways in which Alternate Histories can perform the function of universalizing the legacy of National Socialism. The contrast between Philip K. While the two non-German stories approach the premise of a German victory in the Second World War from very different angles, the discursive functions they perform are overall rather similar. On the one hand, the main narrative presents the reader with the notion that the defeat of the United States would not have necessarily resulted in a dystopian society. By depicting life in the Japanese-occupied Western states as characterized by a relative normalcy, the novel questions the hegemonic American memory narrative of World War II as the fight against an absolute evil.
On the other hand, the second alternative course of history portrayed in the fragmentary elements of Grasshopper suggests that a victory over the Nazis need not have necessarily been a preferable outcome. However, while this narrative technique unquestionably represents a universalization of elements of German fascism by suggesting that they were not exclusive to the Nazi regime in its specific historical setting, it does not effectively relativize National Socialism itself. But here the primary focus is not on British but on German society.
By imagining the removal of Hitler from history as the cause for an even greater success of the Nazi movement, Making History emphasizes the socio-political conditions from which it drew its power. In this sense, both non-German Alternate Histories in this chapter contain universalizing elements, but do not provide an exculpatory narrative that revises the causes and effects of real historical events. Conversely, this is precisely the function of all three German-language examples in this chapter.
Here, too, the complicity of the German population in the rise of National Socialism is obscured by suggesting that the arrest of Hitler and a small number of his early collaborators would have resulted in Germany developing unhindered into a tolerant and open society. At the same time, the historical crimes committed in the name of the Third Reich are once more projected onto other nations. The character of the Italian woman functions as a stand-in for the guilty conscience of postwar Germans and the counterfactual exaggeration of the atrocities committed by the Italian fascists conceals the specific historical conditions that produced the Holocaust.
This is evident especially in the fact that, like non-literary forms of anti-memory, this narrative no longer relies on a denial of German guilt by externalization, but predominantly on situating it within a relativist framework. Instead, the narrative is aimed primarily at cultivating the notion of a universal commensurability of National Socialist ideology. Here, envisioning Germany under a different leader as more successful but just as authoritarian as the Third Reich does not serve to foreground the socio-political conditions that led to the rise of National Socialism.
Rather, it serves as a parable in which the alternate quasi-fascist Germany is no different from any other authoritarian system and in which the specific characteristics of German fascism are dissolved into a reductionist critique of globalized Capitalism. After all, the resistance movement was not only, as Gordon A. To a certain extent, the psychology behind the metonymic identification of the vast, compliant majority of Germans with a small number of seemingly valiant heroes is understandable and, for the most part, harmless.
Hans Wagener Stuttgart: Reclam, , For a more recent overview of its cinematic representation, cf. Within the context of Alternate History, however, the capacity of the memory of German resistance to act as an exculpatory narrative is taken a step further with the counterfactual envisioning of successful and consequential acts of opposition against the Nazis.
In each case, the basic premise is the representation of instances of German resistance against the National Socialist regime that did not exist, or did not have the same impact, in real history. In contrast to both other chapters, the concrete individual implementations of this premise are much more varied here, that is, the same motif is incorporated into three very different allohistorical scenarios.
Juli, German dissidence is an integral aspect of the original alteration of history, with the story imagining a victorious German Reich after the successful assassination of Adolf Hitler. Germany has defeated the Soviet Union in with a successful summer offensive launched against Moscow, reached a peace accord with a pro-German British government in after Churchill has been run out of the country and fled to Canada , and has entered into a state of perpetual Cold War with the Americans in , as a result of the establishment of mutually assured nuclear destruction. Cited in the following as FL.
What begins with the discovery of an unidentified dead body quickly expands into a story of a widespread conspiracy to cover up the German past. Utterly disillusioned with National Socialism, he is brought in to investigate a drowning death near Schwanenwerder, a residential island for the Nazi elite in the Havel river on the outskirts of Berlin. The initially anonymous body is soon identified as Josef Buhler [sic], a high-ranking Party official. March soon learns that another prominent Nazi, Wilhelm Stuckart, is also dead — allegedly by his own hand but under suspicious conditions. In the course of his investigation, March meets Charlie Maguire, an American reporter who had been secretly in contact with Stuckart, who has promised her the story of a lifetime.
Through the involvement of the Gestapo the two discover that there is a third man, Martin Luther, who is connected to the other two but has disappeared. In spite of repeated interference by the Gestapo and a story about the three men being involved in an international art theft ring, which quickly turns out to be a ruse, March and Maguire follow their leads to a bank in Zurich, where they find proof that Luther is still alive. Back in Berlin, Luther contacts Charlie and they agree on a meeting, but Luther is shot by a sniper before he can divulge any information.
Andreas Hillgruber Munich: dtv, Previously, March had already been able to link the three dead Nazis to a conference held in the Wannsee district of Berlin in , but could find no additional information on that meeting. In preparation for the treaty with the Americans, the regime had been trying to finally tie up all loose ends of this secret by eliminating everyone involved, explaining the deaths of Buhler, Stuckart and Luther. March and Maguire decide to smuggle the documents out of the country via the neutral Switzerland in order to disclose the information to the public.
Maguire takes on a false identity and leaves for the Swiss border, but March is betrayed by his indoctrinated son and arrested by the Gestapo. He is subsequently freed by a seemingly friendly Gestapo officer and helped by Arthur Nebe, the head of the Kriminalpolizei in Berlin, but quickly realizes that it was only a set-up in order to find Maguire and the documents. He leads his old colleagues eastward, in the wrong direction, not only to give Charlie time to cross the border, but also in search of any material evidence of the Holocaust.
Fassbender also notes that the novel ultimately also became a bestseller in Germany, but that a not insignificant part of that success was due to its popularity with a Neo-Nazi audience. See ibid.
And then it all starts going wrong. No police promotions for ten years. Divorced, And then the reports start. Blockwart: persistent refusal to contribute to Winter Relief. Overheard in the canteen making disparaging comments about Himmler. Overheard in bars, overheard in restaurants, overheard in corridors Although widely unaddressed in discussions of the novel, the name Xavier March sticks out of the text like the proverbial sore thumb. Whereas all other German characters, many of which represent actual historical personae, are assigned obviously German names, the protagonist remains conspicuously Anglophone.
Ihre besondere Sicht auf Sie gestaltete um dieses Ereignis herum individuelle witzige Postkarten aus allem was ihr irgendwie seltsam, bunt, typisch, klischeehaft, widersinnig oder sonstwie geeignet schien Dem Autor, der Gestalter und Designer ist und seit vielen Jahren Doch Prag hat viel mehr zu bieten - z. Eine intensive Natur- und Selbsterfahrung, die mit etwa 60 Bildern dieses Erlebnis beschreibt. Zwischenreich Fotografien von Medusa Cramer.
Orte sind hier Milieus von Dingen, Gegenden von Zeichen, die sich am Rande unserer Gesichtsfelds zeigen; der Blick ist zur Seite geneigt, weg vom Lebenden hin zur seiner scheinbar leblosen Substanz, seiner Infrastruktur. Zumeist charakterisiert Leere die dokumentierten Orte, sie ist hier die eigentliche Substanz, sie ist das ruhige Und wie strukturiere ich die Arbeit an einem Drehtag?
Not in United States? Choose your country's store to see books available for purchase. Choose Store. Kanz, Christine. Koiran, Linda. Schreiben in fremder Sprache. Yoko Tawada und Galsan Tschinag. Lewis, Alison. Eine schwierige Ehe. Schaumann, Caroline. Memory Matters. Veel, Kristin. William, Jennifer Marston. Kritik der Hermeneutik. Interpretationsphilosophie und Realismus. Schneider, Gerd K.
Log in to Wiley Online Library
Die Facetten des Alter n s. Volume 84 , Issue 2. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username. Tools Request permission Export citation Add to favorites Track citation. Share Give access Share full text access. Share full text access. Please review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.